<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 11, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Marcus McAskin <<a href="mailto:mmcaskin@wmcattorneys.com" class="">mmcaskin@wmcattorneys.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span style="color: rgb(31, 73, 125); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none;" class=""><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>think that’s the plan – the District will take over the sign maintenance<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""><div class="">Understood; but if we’re distributing contracts that assert that we are responsible, don’t we need that vote first? I’m not objecting to the decision, I just want to make sure the cart isn’t in front of the horse and that we aren’t assuming the liability before the signs are restored, or the funds received.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">But if everyone else is happy, I’ll simply abstain. Since I missed the last discussion, I could simply be under informed ;><br class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>