[Board] Fwd: Uncaught bounce notification

Wed Dec 19 11:56:37 EST 2018

Note "bounces" is not part of our address (it's an automatically created
sublist for the system to communicate errors)

Keith Bierman
khbkhb at gmail.com
303 997 2749

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Harold Roberts <hrroberts51 at gmail.com>
To: "'Board'" *<board-bounces at chnorthmetro.us
<board-bounces at chnorthmetro.us>>*
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:24:34 -0700
Subject: FW: Inspections

All:

See the e-mail text below and the attachment.  I have read this publication
and am still not convinced that the sump pumps are the problem.

[image: http://www.energyfuels.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/emaillogo.png]
<http://www.energyfuels.com/>*Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.*
------------------------------

Harold R. Roberts, P.E.
*Conventional Operations Consultant*

t: 303.389.4160  | c: 303.902.2870  | f: 303.389.4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228

http://www.energyfuels.com
------------------------------

This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use of person(s) mentioned as the
recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential
and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You
may not use, distribute print or copy this message if you are not the
intended recipient(s).

*From:* Richard Fullerton <rbfullerton at gmail.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, November 17, 2018 12:47 PM
*To:* Harold Roberts <hrroberts51 at gmail.com>
*Cc:* Sue Blair <sblair at crsofcolorado.com>
*Subject:* Re: Inspections

Harold -

Our Board met on Thursday and talked about our outreach to the other
Districts. Devonshire is still an unknown, though their last contact
indicated that they planned to inspect for sump pumps, so I remain
optimistic and plan to contact their President, Dudley Morton, to see if I
can arrange a meeting.

In discussing Cherry Hills North, Bill Kilingensmith wondered if another
round of discussions on the science of his findings might convince your
Board. I told him that I felt that there was some reluctance in finding
sump pumps as the lone culprits in the 2015 surcharge, and that you had
other considerations in declining to inspect, particularly resident
resistance in light of prior experience. For Bill's sake, I agreed to pass
along his updated findings that were published recently in the Journal of
Environmental Engineering that you will find attached.

Recognizing that your Board may be struggling to undertake an inspection
project, I wonder if I could ask you not just to put my recent letter in
front of them at your next meeting. It would make a significant difference
if you were to personally endorse inspections. You were clear that you
remain unconvinced of the amount of water sump pumps add to the problem
when groundwater is at its highest. Because such a study would be
impractical and perhaps impossible for us to undertake, your support of
inspections might sway your Board in a joint effort with Mansfield and
Hillcrest and put the issue to rest.

There will be some headache involved in setting up an inspection system.
Homeowners need to be scheduled, some rescheduled, and in some cases
reinspected if sumps are found. A management company or engineering firm
would have to be hired for systematic pursuit, and it would likely take
several months to complete. And from what you have explained, you could
find some pushback to inspections that may require hand-holding. Any board
is unlikely to undertake such a task unless convinced or inspired to do so.
To date they seem unconvinced, so I am suggesting that your leadership
could be key.

Mansfield Heights would be glad to provide any assistance in terms of
contact information of firms that helped us complete the task or ideas that
may smooth the way. But such details are not what will change minds. I am
asking instead for your help in getting this done.

Please let me know what the Board decides,

Dick Fullerton

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:02 AM Harold Roberts <hrroberts51 at gmail.com>
wrote:

Dick:

You summary of our discussion looks very complete.  I will have no problem
forwarding this on to our Board.

[image: http://www.energyfuels.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/emaillogo.png]
<http://www.energyfuels.com/>*Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc.*
------------------------------

Harold R. Roberts, P.E.
*Conventional Operations Consultant*

t: 303.389.4160  | c: 303.902.2870  | f: 303.389.4125
225 Union Blvd., Suite 600
Lakewood, CO 80228

http://www.energyfuels.com
------------------------------

This e-mail is intended for the exclusive use of person(s) mentioned as the
recipient(s). This message and any attached files with it are confidential
and may contain privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient(s) please delete this message and notify the sender. You
may not use, distribute print or copy this message if you are not the
intended recipient(s).

*From:* Richard Fullerton <rbfullerton at gmail.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2018 9:40 AM
*To:* Harold Roberts <hrroberts51 at gmail.com>
*Subject:* Inspections

Harold - Thanks for the conversation yesterday. It helps me to recall what
we talked about, so I put my thoughts into writing. Please let me know if
there is anything I missed.

Dick.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://chnorthmetro.us/pipermail/board_chnorthmetro.us/attachments/20181219/bf0b4145/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Klingensmith-Mays publication in Journal of Environmental Engineering 2018.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 734678 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://chnorthmetro.us/pipermail/board_chnorthmetro.us/attachments/20181219/bf0b4145/attachment-0001.pdf>